[CQ-Contest] WRTC Scoring Question

[Edward Sawyer]

You need to look further down the rules and look for the "exceptions".

Ed  N1UR

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w at gmail.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 5:14 PM
To: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS at advanced-conversion.com>
Cc: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Scoring Question

Where do you get that there are three qualifying districts within NA
#1 (the qualification area).

"Maximum Score is the largest published score in the applicant’s category from the =Qualification Area= in which the applicant’s score was made."

I dont see any reference to a subdivision of the Qualification area into separate call area.

73 Rich NN3W

On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 12:34 PM Edward Sawyer <EdwardS at advanced-conversion.com> wrote:
>
> I wanted to put out the question to the group here to see if I am interpreting this correctly.
>
> In the 1st qualification area of the US, there are 3 qualifying districts, W1, W2, W3.  If the highest score in W1 is 5 Million and the highest score in W2 is 4 Million and the highest score in W3 is 3 Million, there will be 3 people that made those highest scores earning 1,000 points - assuming they are all HP Unassisted.  So instead of 1 winner of the area there are actually 3 winners of the area for every contest. And there are only 3 TL selected from the W1, W2, W3 area.  Even though there could have been numerous scores much higher than the W3 score in this example, the W3 winner will get the same credit as if they had the 5 Million score.
>
> If the above is correct, this seems highly distorted.  You are guaranteeing 3 x 1000 point winners in the contest vs it should only have 1 x 1000  points.
>
> Please comment on whether this is in fact right.  Doesn't feel right....
>
> Ed  N1UR
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest