[CQ-Contest] Was "2024 ARRL DX CW Raw Scores - Is the LP Winner from MO - REALLY?

[WW3S]

My two cents , a top entry should be required to identify the station they operated from, if different than their home station…..and 95+ % of the operators already do….I just dont understand the secrecy, but sooner or later the suspect logs will be made public, then the real crowd sourcing can begin….

Sent from my iPad

> On Mar 6, 2024, at 8:43 PM, Steve Maki <lists at oakcom.org> wrote:
> 
> It seems there should at least *be a way* for the station call to be listed in the final results (if desired), same as there is in the 3830 results? Not necessarily a requirement.
> 
> -Steve K8LX
> 
>> On 03/06/24 6:57 PM, john at kk9a.com wrote:
>> 3830 scores has a field for the station's callsign.  I have never operated
>> remotely but whenever I guest op in the Caribbean I always list the station
>> owner with my score.  Of course if it was a field day type setup there would
>> be no station callsign other than the one issued to me.
>> 
>> Are you proposing that the physical address or coordinates of the
>> transmitter be required with a log submission?  How often has the QTH really
>> been in question?  The ARRL already requires a grid locator to submit a log
>> which gets you pretty close to the actual physical location.
>> 
>> John KK9A
>> 
>> 
>> Edward Sawyer N1UR wrote:
>> 
>> <snip>
>> 
>> It brings up an interesting point.  Nowhere does any contest organizer
>> actually require a disclosure of what station location you operated from.
>> In these days of remote, I think that should change.
>> 
>> Ed  N1UR
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest