[CQ-Contest] Contest calls (was [RTTY] A Gripe/Rant WPX RTTY)

[W7TMT]

The fewer Dits the better!

73
W7TMT



On Wednesday, February 18th, 2026 at 7:33 PM, John Geiger via CQ-Contest <cq-contest at contesting.com> wrote:

> I have wondered the same about RTTY calls, if some characters are easier for the software to copy than others.  As someone who used to have a J in their call, it often was changed to India on phone, not sure how that happened as to me they don't sound much alike, other than they both have 3 syllables.  The last letter C often gets switched to K on CW and the first C often gets switched to G on phone.
> 
> I am sure the perfect call is out there, I just havent found it yet
> 
> 73 John AF5CC
> not AF5CK or AF5GC
> 
> 
> 
> Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
> 
> On Wednesday, February 18th, 2026 at 11:35 PM, ktfrog007--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest at contesting.com> wrote:
> 
> >  Re: contest calls with all the USA 1x2 and 2x1 calls used up
> > 2x2 calls seem unpopular, but sometimes they are shorter or better than 1x2 or 2x1 calls. AE5TT is shorter than my call, AB1J, and easier to copy. Folks like AA5AU use 2x2s quite successfully.
> > 1x3 calls can be relatively short and easy to copy, too, depending on their characters. Wx3 calls are popular because of their long tradition.
> > On CW, characters should always be considered. Dashes carry more energy than dots and are easier to copy, but too many make for long calls.
> > Dots can be difficult to distinguish. S and H shouldn't be adjacent nor should 5 and H. A 5 in a call is not a problem adjacent to most other characters, as it's right where you'd expect it to be. Dots at the end of calls tend to get lost (Once I was W1GTE. Bad call)
> > Other characters can be confusing, too, especially with wishful thinking. For instance, B becoming a 6, like with that nice DX mult A61J.
> > Some calls have a nice rhythm on CW. I've always liked K3EST, especially at high speed, which just gallops through my head.
> >
> > On RTTY, it's just call length, as far as I know.  I don't know if some RTTY characters more difficult to decode than others. Maybe someone else does.
> > On FT modes, call length doesn't matter.
> > On phone, call length can be a consideration, but you have to take phonetics and pronunciation into account, too. I spent a Field Day once using W3GJB, which I found difficult. With my call both Juliet and Japan as phonetics often get turned into Quebec. I have a slight speech problem, but some of this also has to do with having a small signal, which is another thing to take into consideration on all modes. Big signals decode better by meat or machine. Get better antennas and an amp if you can.
> > 73,Ken, AB1J
> >
> >     On Wednesday, February 18, 2026 at 01:34:43 PM EST, Butchie KAØWWT via groups.io <ka0wwt=pm.me at groups.io> wrote:
> >
> >  Al, Understood, my reply simply indicated that a program, such as 1x1, as an example would be nice for us to have. I do understand the requirements that go along with that block of callsigns. --73Butch - KAØWWT_._,_._,_Groups.io Links:
> >  You receive all messages sent to this group.
> >
> > View/Reply Online (#50713) | Reply to Group | Reply to Sender | Mute This Topic| New Topic
> >
> > Your Subscription |Contact Group Owner |Unsubscribe [ktfrog007 at aol.com]
> > _._,_._,_
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>