[ct-user] CT <> TR <> others

[Bob Wruble]

when i first switched from ct to tr i kinda thot the same until i began to
realize wat tree ( a world class contester) was trying to do in terms 
improving operating efficiency etc........probably best if one had no
exposure to ct....it kinda spoils u in terms of ease of initial use.......

but, if u make the investment in time required to master tr you will (I believe)
be rewarded in the long term.......especially if u want to play with two
radio operations etc......

for the casual op ct wks but i grew  very unhappy  abt the support 
level and lack of new features etc. with ct soooooo.... i took my bisiness 
elsewhere!!   also by using tr for general logging i keep my proficiency
up on all the features and setup options....then occasionally i xfer the 
log.dat file  to my master log (DX4WIN) for qsling and record keeping.....

73 w7gg

----------
> From: wheeler <wheelerm@actrix.gen.nz>
> To: ct-user@ve7tcp.ampr.org
> Subject: [ct-user] CT <> TR <> others
> Date: Wednesday, June 04, 1997 7:33 PM
> 
> hi
> 
> Bob w7gg, has some good / excellant points.
> 
> True CT support is lacking and development seems to have stopped !
> 
> Where TR and others fail is in the User Interface, maybe I find this due to
> being used to CT, but TR , etc. needs work in this area.
> 
> 73 de Malcolm ZL2UDF
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Submissions:              ct-user@ve7tcp.ampr.org
> Administrative requests:  ct-user-REQUEST@ve7tcp.ampr.org
> WWW:                      http://www.ve7tcp.ampr.org/Software/ct
> Questions:                owner-ct-user@ve7tcp.ampr.org

--
Submissions:              ct-user@ve7tcp.ampr.org
Administrative requests:  ct-user-REQUEST@ve7tcp.ampr.org
WWW:                      http://www.ve7tcp.ampr.org/Software/ct
Questions:                owner-ct-user@ve7tcp.ampr.org