[ct-user] CT to ADIF 1.14 released -- fixes CT 9.68.002
problem
Jim Reisert
jjreisert@alum.mit.edu
Sat, 01 Dec 2001 07:33:37 -0500
At 12:23 PM 12/1/2001 +0000, alsopb wrote:
>Just wast was problem with 9.68.002? Does this mean that future CT
>versions will also reqire ADIF 1.14?
The problem was specific to 9.68.002. It would also have been broken with
9.68.004 but would not with 9.67 or a possible 9.69. It had to do with the
CT version number, not the content of the file.
But in general, it's always best to have the latest version, in case there
is another bug I need to troubleshoot later.
- Jim
--
Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863
USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.com