[ct-user] Fwd: multi-two transmitter identification - ARRL reply
Jim Pratt" <firstname.lastname@example.org
Tue, 13 Mar 2001 00:41:36 -0000
The other day I posed the question below to N1ND as to whether the TX1/TX2
ID flag is still required in a Cabrillo log output. Here is his response.
Thus multi-two (callsign).txt outputs from CT version 9.57.004 will NOT meet
HQ requirements and will be reclassified as multi-multi logs. I have filed
a bug report and will see what earlier versions of CT produce in terms of
From: "Henderson, Dan N1ND" <email@example.com>
To: 'Jim Pratt ' <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: RE: Re: [ct-user] multi-two transmitter identification?
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 18:14:41 -0500
The very last column in the Cabrillo line-by-line log file is for the
transmitter designator in the Multi-Two category. It does need to be there
for the entry or the entry will automatically be reclassified as a
Multi-Multi since the band changes can not be calculated.
Thanks and 73
From: Jim Pratt
Sent: 3/11/2001 12:48 PM
Subject: Fwd: Re: [ct-user] multi-two transmitter identification?
Dan: FYI. Trying to get logs ready to file but there seems to be a
problem. Please confirm that the transmitter ID really needs to be
for a Cabrillo log. I can see how a log-checking program could check
the six band changes without the TX ID, but the rules do require it. I
filing a "bug report" with CT.
From: "Jim Reisert AD1C" <email@example.com>
Reply-To: "Jim Reisert AD1C" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "Jim Pratt" <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: [ct-user] multi-two transmitter identification?
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 20:31:57 -0500
It sounds like Ct is broken - file a bug at www.k1ea.com
On Sat, 10 Mar 2001 02:35:44 -0000, Jim Pratt wrote:
>I haven't seen this mentioned so perhaps I am doing something
>ARRL rules for multi-two in the DX contest state:
>4.9. Multioperator Two Transmitter category entries must indicate
>transmitter makes each QSO in the log file.
>I am using CT version 9.57.004 and as far as I can detect in the
>(callsign).txt file there is no indication of which transmitter made
>QSO. In the .log file there is the usual "0" or "1" in the
>Has this rule been waived for Cabrillo entries like the on/off time
>indication, am I doing something wrong, or is CT broken?
>73, Jim N6IG
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@contesting.com