[ct-user] Let's talk about CT networking

David Robbins k1ttt@arrl.net
Fri, 09 Nov 2001 00:21:36 +0000


Ciprian Sufitchi wrote:
> The only reason that I think that CT is better to stay on DOS, is because it
> runs on very low-end computers, as XT or 286. But these days, an old 486
> computer is priced at $100 (including monitor), so anyone may have on his
> desktop a good computer for Windows 95...

note, that this is no longer true.  a 386dx is minimum now the latest versions
will not run on 286 or earlier cpu's.  and it requires something more than 2meg
of ram for the latest versions to even load, 4 or more meg is probably best.


-- 
David Robbins K1TTT
e-mail: mailto://k1ttt@arrl.net
web: http://www.k1ttt.net
AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net