[ct-user] Support for NAQP - Wanted ???
kq2m at earthlink.net
Wed Dec 17 22:34:33 EST 2003
My comments are clearly written and require no interpretation. I was
referring to SLANDER, not a disagreement between two people.
> > In the time that I have been a subscriber to this reflector over the
> > few years, I have watched you REPEATEDLY slander myself and many, many
> > others on this reflector.
> Not to toss a wet blanket on this delightful flamefest, but
> even "intense disagreement expressed in strong and opinionated language"
> does not constitute "slander". Check it out in your Funk and Wagnalls.
> 73, de Hans, K0HB
More information about the CT-User