[Fourlanders] 2009 June VHF Claimed Scores

[Jim Worsham]

I see that K5QE also did well.  He is really nipping at the heels of W2SZ.
K8GP must have been limited with that score.

73
Jim, W4KXY

It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart
you are.  If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong.
Richard P. Feynman
-----Original Message-----
From: fourlanders-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:fourlanders-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Brian McCarthy
Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2009 2:25 PM
To: Fourlanders
Subject: [Fourlanders] 2009 June VHF Claimed Scores

I got a note of congratulations last weekend for the Fourlanders 2009
June VHF score. I had not looked, and was pleasantly surprised by the
claimed scores listed on the ARRL contest web page. We seem to have
done well. Depending on categories entered, W4NH (currently) appears
to be no less 7th and as high as 5th or even 4th in full multi-op.
This based on the claimed scores before log checking. Here is an
excerpt of a quick spreadsheet that I created:

W2SZ    1784508 Multi
K5QE    1365520 Multi
W3CCX   736450 Multi?
K9NS      674322 Limited?
K8GP      438792 Multi?
K3YTL     430728 ?
W4NH     354033 Multi
W3SO     346801 Limited
W0AUS   328041 ?
AA4ZZ     325350 Limited

The claimed scores page does not differentiate between full Multi-op
or Limited Multi-op. Can anyone fill in the categories where I have
question marks?

Thanks!
Brian
NX9O
_______________________________________________
Fourlanders mailing list
Fourlanders at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/fourlanders