[Fourlanders] Internet Server For Testing?
Paul Yeager
paul at mtnlist.com
Thu Sep 26 14:21:29 EDT 2013
Well, they sure don't provide much online documentation, do they?
Paul Yeager
828 400 9442 (cell)
________________________________
From: Kos <kosmetatos at gmail.com>
To: Paul Yeager <paul at mtnlist.com>
Cc: John Kludt <johnnykludt at earthlink.net>; Fourlanders <fourlanders at contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 12:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Fourlanders] Internet Server For Testing?
Don't know the answer to that offhand; I'd have to dig through the docs to see if it's documented anywhere. Do you have a firewall that can log attempts, including the port sought? If we can't find the port number we might try to see if it fails and what port it's addressing, then open that one port.
Kos
On 9/26/13 11:19 AM, Paul Yeager wrote:
The application displayed at the link I provided runs under linux. However, that doesn't preclude having a windows box available at the same address, as long as the same port isn't needed.
>
>What port does Writelog expect to connect on?
>
>
>
>
>Paul Yeager
>828 400 9442 (cell)
>
>
>
>________________________________
> From: Kos <kosmetatos at gmail.com>
>To: Paul Yeager <paul at mtnlist.com>
>Cc: John Kludt <johnnykludt at earthlink.net>; Fourlanders <fourlanders at contesting.com>
>Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 11:06 AM
>Subject: Re: [Fourlanders] Internet Server For Testing?
>
>
>
>This is linux? Could you expose a windows box and Writelog?
>
>
Kos
>
>
>
>
>On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Paul Yeager <paul at mtnlist.com> wrote:
>
>I can do better than that.
>>
>>I have a dynamic dns set up for w4ski_node.linuxsecured.net. Check this out: http://w4ski_node.linuxsecured.net:8081/>
>>To: Paul Yeager <paul at mtnlist.com>
>>Cc: John Kludt <johnnykludt at earthlink.net>; Fourlanders <fourlanders at contesting.com>
>>Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 11:30 AM
>>Subject: Re: [Fourlanders] Internet Server For Testing?
>>
>>
>>
>>Paul,
>>
>>
If you can expose a server to a public IP address we could test the connectivity. It would be interesting to see how it might work in a distributed environment.
>>
>>Kos
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Paul Yeager <paul at mtnlist.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I have no idea what Writelog
expects of a server, but I'd bet
someone on the
>>> list does.
>>> I have plenty of computers
sitting around, and a reliable
broadband
>>> connection. If this is something
that can be done by running a server
on my
>>> LAN and doing port forwarding at my
router, I'd be happy to do that.
>>> 73 de W4SKI
>>>
>>> Paul Yeager
>>> 828 400 9442 (cell)
>>>
_________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>> From: John Kludt <johnnykludt at earthlink.net>
>>> To: Fourlanders <fourlanders at contesting.com>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013
2:08 PM
>>> Subject: [Fourlanders] Internet
Server For Testing?
>>> Guys,
>>> Playing with WriteLog 11.11 as
requested. I did buy a $99 refurb at
>>> MIcrocenter just for logging.
Turns out you can't buy a PC with XP
>>> anymore
>>> so I am running under Windows 7
Home edition in 32 bit mode, using the
XP
>>> option under properties. If
somebody has a legal copy of XP
Service Pack
>>> 3
>>> media and is willing to share, I
can set up a dual booth option. 2014
XP
>>> stops being supported so at some
point we are going to have to deal
with
>>> it.
>>> Much of the WriteLog issue seems
to be communications over the network
and
>>> with no network those functions
are kind of hard to test. Any energy
>>> around
>>> setting up an Internet based
server for testing purposes? If we
can make
>>> that work, Great White LAN trafic
should be easy! I did get wondering
>>> with
>>> the latency issues if we need a
bigger server in Great White. The
little
>>> machines are great for logging
but I am wondering if central logging
plus
>>> skeds plus gabs might get backed
up at the server and hence the delay.
>>> You all have probably been down
all of these roads before, but as the
>>> newbie, I wanted to ask.
>>> 73,
>>> Johnny
>>>
_______________________________________________
>>> Fourlanders mailing list
>>> [1]Fourlanders at contesting.com
>>>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/fourlanders
>>>
>>>References
>>>
>>> 1. mailto:Fourlanders at contesting.com
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Fourlanders mailing list
>>>Fourlanders at contesting.com
>>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/fourlanders
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
Well, they sure don't provide much online documentation, do they?
Paul Yeager
828 400 9442 (cell)
_________________________________________________________________
From: Kos <kosmetatos at gmail.com>
To: Paul Yeager <paul at mtnlist.com>
Cc: John Kludt <johnnykludt at earthlink.net>; Fourlanders
<fourlanders at contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 12:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Fourlanders] Internet Server For Testing?
Don't know the answer to that offhand; I'd have to dig through the docs to
see if it's documented anywhere. Do you have a firewall that can log
attempts, including the port sought? If we can't find the port number we
might try to see if it fails and what port it's addressing, then open that
one port.
Kos
On 9/26/13 11:19 AM, Paul Yeager wrote:
The application displayed at the link I provided runs under linux. However,
that doesn't preclude having a windows box available at the same address, as
long as the same port isn't needed.
What port does Writelog expect to connect on?
Paul Yeager
828 400 9442 (cell)
_________________________________________________________________
From: Kos [1]<kosmetatos at gmail.com>
To: Paul Yeager [2]<paul at mtnlist.com>
Cc: John Kludt [3]<johnnykludt at earthlink.net>; Fourlanders
[4]<fourlanders at contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 11:06 AM
Subject: Re: [Fourlanders] Internet Server For Testing?
This is linux? Could you expose a windows box and Writelog?
Kos
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Paul Yeager <[5]paul at mtnlist.com> wrote:
I can do better than that.
I have a dynamic dns set up for [6]w4ski_node.linuxsecured.net. Check this
out: http://w4ski_node.linuxsecured.net:8081/>
To: Paul Yeager <[7]paul at mtnlist.com>
Cc: John Kludt <[8]johnnykludt at earthlink.net>; Fourlanders
<[9]fourlanders at contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Fourlanders] Internet Server For Testing?
Paul,
If you can expose a server to a public IP address we could test the
connectivity. It would be interesting to see how it might work in a
distributed environment.
Kos
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Paul Yeager <[10]paul at mtnlist.com> wrote:
I have no idea what Writelog expects of a server, but I'd bet someone
on the
list does.
I have plenty of computers sitting around, and a reliable broadband
connection. If this is something that can be done by running a server
on my
LAN and doing port forwarding at my router, I'd be happy to do that.
73 de W4SKI
Paul Yeager
[11]828 400 9442 (cell)
_________________________________________________________________
From: John Kludt <[12]johnnykludt at earthlink.net>
To: Fourlanders <[13]fourlanders at contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 2:08 PM
Subject: [Fourlanders] Internet Server For Testing?
Guys,
Playing with WriteLog 11.11 as requested. I did buy a $99 refurb
at
MIcrocenter just for logging. Turns out you can't buy a PC with XP
anymore
so I am running under Windows 7 Home edition in 32 bit mode, using
the XP
option under properties. If somebody has a legal copy of XP Service
Pack
3
media and is willing to share, I can set up a dual booth option.
2014 XP
stops being supported so at some point we are going to have to deal
with
it.
Much of the WriteLog issue seems to be communications over the
network and
with no network those functions are kind of hard to test. Any energy
around
setting up an Internet based server for testing purposes? If we can
make
that work, Great White LAN trafic should be easy! I did get
wondering
with
the latency issues if we need a bigger server in Great White. The
little
machines are great for logging but I am wondering if central logging
plus
skeds plus gabs might get backed up at the server and hence the
delay.
You all have probably been down all of these roads before, but as
the
newbie, I wanted to ask.
73,
Johnny
_______________________________________________
Fourlanders mailing list
[1][14]Fourlanders at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/fourlanders
References
1. mailto:[15]Fourlanders at contesting.com
_______________________________________________
Fourlanders mailing list
[16]Fourlanders at contesting.com
[17]http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/fourlanders
References
1. mailto:kosmetatos at gmail.com
2. mailto:paul at mtnlist.com
3. mailto:johnnykludt at earthlink.net
4. mailto:fourlanders at contesting.com
5. mailto:paul at mtnlist.com
6. http://w4ski_node.linuxsecured.net/
7. mailto:paul at mtnlist.com
8. mailto:johnnykludt at earthlink.net
9. mailto:fourlanders at contesting.com
10. mailto:paul at mtnlist.com
11. file://localhost/tmp/tmpn0dITD.html
12. mailto:johnnykludt at earthlink.net
13. mailto:fourlanders at contesting.com
14. mailto:Fourlanders at contesting.com
15. mailto:Fourlanders at contesting.com
16. mailto:Fourlanders at contesting.com
17. http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/fourlanders
More information about the Fourlanders
mailing list