[Mldxcc] [NCCC] The case against the revised Amateur Radio Parity Act

[Alan Maenchen]

If I remember right, PRB-1 is also flaky in that it doesn't define what
must be allowed and what can be not-allowed. Same thing here I think.  It's
been a while but I fought the City of San Jose with PRB-1 and won. This was
shortly after N6TV ran the gauntlet with San Jose and also won. Thanks Bob!

Here in Maui, I have an HOA architectural rule that limits any antenna to
no higher than 4 feet.
I asked for, and was granted, a variance for a 70 foot tower.  It can be
done, but you have to push and follow procedures..

73, Alan  AD6E



On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist <
richard at karlquist.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 8/7/2017 6:58 PM, Bob Wilson, N6TV wrote:
>
> HOAs more power than they ever had before, and no one wants that.  HOA
>> residents will now have to get prior HOA permission to string up a wire or
>> put a mobile whip on a tripod.
>>
>>
> In the real world, the FCC is unlikely to put much effort into enforcing
> this rule, if it were to be enacted.  Also, the wire or whip might be
> considered in the "de minimus" legal category.
>
> Rick N6RK
> _______________________________________________
> NCCC mailing list
> THIS EMAIL LIST IS A NO-FLAME ZONE! See guidelines at:
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/nccc
> Post to: nccc at contesting.com (never publish this address)
> Manage your subscription at: http://lists.contesting.com/ma
> ilman/options/nccc
> Archives at: http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/private/nccc/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/mldxcc/attachments/20170807/ff539bf3/attachment-0001.html>