[Mldxcc] California QSO Party Rule Changes Affecting MLDXCC

[Dennis Moore]

Some of us have been discussing that also (clubs now eligible). One of 
the rules is that a club must have in-person meetings, which SCCC does 
not seem to have. The rules may need some published clarification of 
what constitutes an in-person meeting (minutes? at least six per year? 
lists of attendees?) SCCC doesn't have by-laws available on their 
website, is that a requirement or should it be?

Like MLDXCC, we expect that they will also lose some contributors to 
local clubs. We're hoping our major players are still wanting to be part 
of a big club effort.

Your point is valid Bill, and we risk not getting a plaque this year, 
but we want everyone's points to count, and we're hoping for a good effort.

73, Dennis NJ6G


On 9/1/2017 01:08, Bill Haddon wrote:
>
> Another change in rules not mentioned in this write up is that clubs 
> formerly excluded  (SCCC for example) may now compete -- under new 
> rules, the only excluded club is the NCCC.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/mldxcc/attachments/20170901/d1ccce3c/attachment.html>