-------- Forwarded Message --------
| Subject: | [narcc] Calif Hands-Free Regulation AB-1785 |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 3 Feb 2017 06:35:34 +0000 (UTC) |
| From: | no1pc@yahoo.com [narcc] <narcc@yahoogroups.com> |
| Reply-To: | narcc@yahoogroups.com, no1pc@yahoo.com |
| To: | narcc@yahoogroups.com <narcc@yahoogroups.com> |
Per
a CHP source:
"The staid and un-moving interpretation ... is that unless the equipment is vehicle OEM, or it is an official vehicle operating in a form of governmental business with official markings, the operation of 2-way radio equipment is prohibited in a moving vehicle unless it conforms to the"dash mounted, one-swipe" form-factor prescribed in the law. No exceptions. This includes public utility vehicles, emergency responders actively in-motion (i.e. volunteer firefighters in POV's), and many more examples."
"The staid and un-moving interpretation ... is that unless the equipment is vehicle OEM, or it is an official vehicle operating in a form of governmental business with official markings, the operation of 2-way radio equipment is prohibited in a moving vehicle unless it conforms to the"dash mounted, one-swipe" form-factor prescribed in the law. No exceptions. This includes public utility vehicles, emergency responders actively in-motion (i.e. volunteer firefighters in POV's), and many more examples."
Editorial:
A plausible first level response from the amateur
community would be Legislative outreach: The law is
over-reaching and open to vague local interpretation
(the letter of the law vs the above broader
interpretation.)
Editorial:
A plausible second level response from the amateur
community would be to get the ARRL legal team engaged.
This
affects not only residents but of course an unknown
number of visiting ham, GMRS, CB tourists with various
radios.
I just
started the petition "California State House:
Qualify or Repeal AB 1785 re: Immersive v. Passive
Devices" and wanted to see if you could help by
adding your name.
It is best there be ONE petition vs. fragmented initiatives/messaging.
The goal is to reach 70K (CA ham population) signatures and we need more support. You can read more and sign the petition here:
https://www.change.org/p/california-state-house-qualify-or-repeal-ab-1785-re-immersive-v-passive-devices?recruiter=17018523&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=share_email_responsive
Thanks!
Jim
It is best there be ONE petition vs. fragmented initiatives/messaging.
The goal is to reach 70K (CA ham population) signatures and we need more support. You can read more and sign the petition here:
https://www.change.org/p/california-state-house-qualify-or-repeal-ab-1785-re-immersive-v-passive-devices?recruiter=17018523&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=share_email_responsive
Thanks!
Jim
__._,_.___
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (2) |
Have you tried the
highest rated email app?
With
4.5 stars in iTunes, the Yahoo Mail app is the
highest rated email app on the market. What are
you waiting for? Now you can access all your
inboxes (Gmail, Outlook, AOL and more) in one
place. Never delete an email again with 1000GB of
free cloud storage.
.
__,_._,___