[NA-User] Marking a QSO to zero points?

[Juha Rantanen]

I forwarded the question to CQ now we just have to wait for the answer. I
will forward the CQ's answer here as soon as I get it. The old one line log
format was better in this kind of cases as one could mark points manually
(the .prn file nowadays).

Juha OH6XX

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Gilmer - N2MG" <n2mg@contesting.com>
To: <oh6xx@sral.fi>
Cc: <NA-User@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 2:12 PM
Subject: Re: [NA-User] Marking a QSO to zero points?


> I know of no way to "zero" a QSL from within NA or CT,
> and besides, there is definitely no way for the
> Cabrillo output to mark a QSO as zero points.  IMO,
> this is Cabrillo's one major shortcoming.
>
> I suggest you ask the contest sponsors themselves for
> a suggestion (then let us all know the answer!)
>
> 73 Mike N2MG
>
>
> On Tue, 27 November 2001, "Juha Rantanen" wrote:
>
> >
> > Hello
> >
> > We were running M/S in latest CQWW and I made a mistake on a multiplier
> > station. I was looking for mults on 160m and as I was tired a had my NA
set
> > for 80m, for some odd reason. I found ER1OO and checked if he was a mult
on
> > 160m. The computer said "needed this band" and I worked him. Then I
noticed
> > that I had the PC set up for 80m, I corrected the band and noted that ER
> > wasn't a mult on 160m. So this comes to my question, how do I mark this
one
> > QSO as zero pointer so that ER1OO will get credit for the QSO? Simple
> > solution would be to removed that QSO but then he would get penalized
> > without any reason. If I leave the QSO as it is (one pointer) will we be
> > moved to M/M class?
> >
> > Juha OH6XX
>
> ________________________________________________
> PeoplePC:  It's for people. And it's just smart.
> http://www.peoplepc.com