[NCC] Ohio Call Letter License Plate Renewal Procedures

Hal Offutt hal at japancorporateresearch.com
Wed Aug 17 16:39:48 EDT 2016


This message will only be of interest to members residing in Ohio who 
have call letter license plates.  Sorry for non-contest content but I 
thought members might be interested.

Ohio has recently adopted a new and restrictive policy about renewing 
amateur radio call letter license plates.  Two years ago, I was able to 
renew my ham plates on line and for a period of two years.  It was a 
very simple, painless process.  Now, under the new policy, I cannot 
renew on line at all and they will only let me renew my plates for a 
period of one year.  I must either mail in my renewal application with a 
copy of my FCC license, or visit a BMV office and provide them a copy of 
my license, and in either case I will get only a one year term.  If I 
had ordinary non-ham license plates, I could renew my registration for 
as much as five years on line.

I have been discussing this with the BMV to find out why this changes 
was made and to try to convince them that these new rules discriminate 
against amateurs since amateurs are now treated less favorably than 
other citizens.  I have also explained that the new policy is 
unnecessary since FCC license information is public and that anyone can 
access a copy of any US amateur license on the FCC website, and also 
that license renewal is free and simple to do. I also pointed out that a 
ham who chose not to renew his license is unlikely to want to keep ham 
call plates when he has to pay an extra $10 per year for them.

The BMV officials explained to me that these changes result not from any 
changes in the statute but rather from their realization that for ten 
years they have not been properly enforcing the existing law (ORC 
4503.14, effective 8-21-97).  According to them, they never should have 
allowed on line or multiple year renewals in the first place.  This 
seems very specious to me and I find it hard to believe that such an 
agency could have failed to enforce a law for such a long time.  This 
article in question is just a paragraph long and I don't read it as 
requiring them to demand a copy of a ham's license every year.  I can't 
understand why they have taken this discriminatory approach unless they 
are trying to discourage hams from applying for or renewing call letter 
plates. As a matter of fact, I am considering giving up mine and getting 
a regular license plate so that I can renew for multiple years on line, 
so if that is their objective it may be working.  But I doubt that the 
Ohio legislature when it authorized call letter plates back in 1952 or 
revised the statute it in 1997 intended to put obstacles in the way of 
hams at renewal time.


I explained to officials at the BMV how these new rules discriminate 
against hams in two ways - not being able to renew on line and only 
being able to renew for one year.  They really didn't have a good reason 
for the former - just that there is no provision for attaching a license 
copy to an on line application. Regarding the latter, they argue that a 
one year renewal is necessary because of the possibility of license 
expiration or revocation by the FCC.  I explained that my license 
expires in 2026 (I just renewed it) and that there is no reason on earth 
why I should not be able to renew for two or more years.  If I can only 
renew for one year this time, I will be submitting a copy of the exact 
same license for the next nine years at renewal time. How much sense 
does this make?  Then they brought up the possibility of FCC license 
revocation as their justification for not allowing a multiple year 
renewal.  I pointed out that revocations of ham licenses are extremely 
rare and that, in the worst case, even if someone did continue to drive 
with ham plates after a license had been revoked, no harm to anyone 
would result from this.   Later, I checked with N1ND at the ARRL and he 
said that in his 10+ years in the regulatory department, he can't recall 
a single license revocation.  So this is another specious reason.

Is anyone else annoyed enough about this to try to do something? I'm 
willing to write letters, sign petitions, etc., but only if others feel 
the same way.  Let me know if you feel like trying to change this 
discriminatory situation.

73, Hal W1NN





More information about the NCC mailing list