[RFI] Re: Town Code Enforcer

[Dave D'Epagnier]

Jeff, mind giving the rest of us on the RFI list a clue as to what Lou's
problem is?

--Dave
K0QE

	----------
	From:  K1ZM@aol.com [SMTP:K1ZM@aol.com]
	Sent:  Wednesday, April 05, 2000 4:18 AM
	To:  QROKING@aol.com; w2re@bestweb.net; rfi@contesting.com;
jkent@bestweb.net; aa2qr@mhv.net; ab2ce@banet.net; jnj13@rcn.com;
charlen@computer.net; ZZDX@aol.com; kb2sfu@computer.net; Kf2wc@aol.com;
k2jen@mciworld.com; ky2j@ibm.net; kmax@idt.net; cwdxer@bestweb.net;
John.Pocreva@pharma.com; qrpp@yahoo.com; n2mci@ulster.net; N2SA@bestweb.net;
TPerry2303@aol.com; w2eny@idsi.net; W2XL@aol.com; WT4Q@mindspring.com;
nitz@selectsa.com; k2gbh@arrl.net
	Subject:  [RFI] Re: Town Code Enforcer


	Hi Lou

	I agree with just about all of what you said.

	Ray should get the RF exposure study done professionally however -
rather 
	than do it on his own.  I have recommended a source.  This is to
avoid a 
	charge that it was "self-serving".

	He also needs to be very careful how he handles this - strictly
under Part 97 
	rules.

	As long as he does and doesn't lose his COOL, he will be okay with
the town 
	and the FCC.

	He may have problems at some point with a CIVIL SUIT being launched
by his 
	neighbors - but that would not come until the FCC conducts its
inspection.

	Neighbors usually won't spend money UNLESS they get no satisfaction
from the 
	FCC or the Town.  But he needs to be prepared for that eventuality -
which is 
	why a good HAM attorney is a wise bet also at this point.  I have
recommended 
	one to him.

	73 JEFF

	K1ZM@aol.com

	--
	FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/rfi-faq.html
	Submissions:              rfi@contesting.com
	Administrative requests:  rfi-REQUEST@contesting.com
	Questions:                owner-rfi@contesting.com

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/rfi-faq.html
Submissions:              rfi@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  rfi-REQUEST@contesting.com
Questions:                owner-rfi@contesting.com