[RFI] part 15 intentional radiators

Kris Mraz N5KM Kris Mraz N5KM <kilo.mike@gte.net>
Sat, 17 Feb 2001 05:13:42 +0000

> FCC Queries Wireless Internet Provider About Interference to
> Hams (Feb 15, 2001) -- The FCC has asked a wireless Internet system
> provider what it intends to do to eliminate interference to Amateur
> Radio operations in the Dallas, Texas area. The FCC wrote Darwin
> Networks Inc on February 8, 2001, regarding complaints of harmful
> interference to Amateur TV on 2.4 GHz that's said to be a result of
> the company's deployment of Part 15 devices in an apartment complex.

If the FCC can come down hard on part 15 intentional radiators on
2.4 Ghz why can't they come down hard on the part 15 intentional 
radiators that are ruining 80m CW (wireless modem jacks)? What's
the difference? Anyone know?

Kris N5KM

FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/rfi
Submissions:              rfi@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  rfi-REQUEST@contesting.com
Questions:                owner-rfi@contesting.com