[RFI] PLCA Response to WSJ Article

[doc]

Please be sure to copy your reply to the FCC and the ARRL,
and perhaps the WSJ editorial page.

73, doc

ps. He's smoking the "intellectual weed" the lawyers and
Enron-types stuffed into the pipe they gave him when they
hired him to shill for them.

N6KJ wrote:
> So, I guess all that work going on in Raleigh to eliminate BPL interference
> is just being done to keep a few technicians employed?  If BPL didn't
> cause interference, then the BPL providers in Raleigh wouldn't be running
> around like chickens with their heads cut off trying to notch the
> ham bands and modify their equipment so that it doesn't use the ham bands.
> 
> What IS this guy smoking?  
> 
> I wonder if his e-mail works.  He's gonna get one from me in a few minutes!
> 
> On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 13:53:47 -0400, Eric Rosenberg wrote:
> 
>>This is the Power Line Communications Association's response to the Wall
>>Street Journal article on BPL.  
>>
>>It comes from the PLCA website: 
>>
>>http://www.plca.net/newsandevents.wsjresponse.htm       


-- 
Thanks! & 73, doc kd4e
West Central Florida
Drake, Heathkit, Kenwood, TenTec, Yaesu
Radio Life: http://www.gospelcom.net/twr/
Linux-Incompatible hardware is defective!
USA Pres. Election 2004: http://www.rnc.org/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~