[RFI] Tv interference

Pete Smith n4zr at contesting.com
Sat Jan 21 16:01:09 EST 2006


Yesterday, a visiting appliance repairman had an interesting story.  He says that the solid-state uP motor controls are and DC motors are becoming very common; in particular, he says that front-loading washing machines need to reverse the direction of drum rotation, and that it is more reliable and cheaper to do it electronically (with a DC motor) than with a mechanical transmission.  FWIW.

73, Pete

 At 02:32 PM 1/21/2006, Jim P wrote:
>It seems to me that the 'exemption' IS the 
>result of lazafaire gov't regulation, and, the 
>provsion in the law ALLOWS regulation if
>and when inteference begins to be expereinced.
>
>It hasn't been until the last few years that solid
>state uP driven motor controls were put into the larger
>widely-available consumer appliances like washers
>and dryers (AND treadmills, as I have experienced ).
>
>The Libertarian view would have no reguation what-
>soever, with local problems corrected by lawsuit 
>or something else more in the vein of mediation  
>between the troubled parties rather than provisions 
>in the law drawn up beforehand.
>
>Jim P  // WB5WPA //
>
>
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Jim Brown" <jim at audiosystemsgroup.com>
>To: "RFI List" <rfi at contesting.com>
>Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 11:19 AM
>Subject: Re: [RFI] Tv interference
>
>
>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 19:15:27 -0700, Tim Groat wrote:
>> 
>> >No, appliances have an exemption written into Part 15:
>> 
>> Thanks, Tim.  More of the best (small) government that (big) 
>> money can buy. Doncha just love it? 
>> 
>> Jim Brown K9YC
>> 
>
>_______________________________________________
>RFI mailing list
>RFI at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi 



More information about the RFI mailing list