[RFI] Is a low pass filter necessary?

[Jim, KS7S]

B&W made the FL-6/1500, which cut off above 54 MHz - that's what I use here. 
I'm sure they had an HF model too.

73 Jim KS7S

-----Original Message----- 
From: Pete Smith N4ZR
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 5:57 AM
To: rfi at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] Is a low pass filter necessary?

Back in the day, I believe Drake made two - a cheaper one that rolled
off between 40 and 50 MHz, and one intended specifically for 6 meters,
with a sharp roll-off above the band and below Channel 2.

73, Pete N4ZR
The World Contest Station Database, updated daily at www.conteststations.com
The Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net, blog at 
reversebeacon.blogspot.com,
spots at telnet.reversebeacon.net, port 7000 and
arcluster.reversebeacon.net, port 7000


On 5/11/2012 8:45 AM, Andy wrote:
>> Perhaps new low-pass filters have a higher corner frequency to
>> accommodate the rash of HF rigs (and now the Elecraft KPA500
>> amplifier) that include 6-meter coverage ...
> I thought the ordinary HF low-pass filters were and still are designed
> for up to HF only, so they don't pass 6 meters which is VHF.  I
> wouldn't expect that to change unless the filter specifically states
> it extends to 6 meters, or 2 meters or 440 (since those two are likely
> to appear on the current rash of modern all-band rigs).
>
> Andy
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi