[RFI] What the Cellphone Industry Doesn't Want You to Know about Radiation Concerns

David Cole dave at nk7z.net
Fri Jun 14 09:00:17 EDT 2013

My God, that snippet of text is not even good English!  Wow!
For Amateur Radio equipment reviews and setups see:

A day without thermonuclear fusion is like a day without sunshine.

On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 08:48 -0400, Pete Smith N4ZR wrote: 
> The article is shot full of juicy bits like this, as well as outright 
> mistakes.
> 73, Pete N4ZR
> Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
> http://reversebeacon.net,
> blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
> For spots, please go to your favorite
> ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.
> On 6/12/2013 4:19 AM, w5gn at mxg.com wrote:
> > ... Henry Lai and Narendra N.P. Singh found significant evidence of DNA damage caused by cellphone light radiation ...Well, it's true that non-ionizing radiation lacks the power to have damage. But its damage seems to come from its modulated signal. So every 900 milliseconds, if you have a cellphone in your pocket, it's getting half of that radiation which is getting into you as it seeks the signal from the tower.
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

More information about the RFI mailing list