[RFI] Comments on RFI from Ductless Air Conditioning Units?

Cortland Richmond ka5s at earthlink.net
Sun May 12 15:43:19 EDT 2013


He may be liable anyway once you point out to him that causing harmful 
interefence would require you shut down the system(I am not a lawyer nor 
is this is not legal advice):


/Uniform Commercial Code//
//
//U.C.C. - ARTICLE 2 - SALES//
//
//..PART 3. GENERAL OBLIGATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF CONTRACT//
//
//§ 2-315. Implied Warranty: Fitness for Particular Purpose.//
//
//Where the seller at the time of contracting has reason to know any 
particular purpose for which the goods are required and that the buyer 
is relying on the seller's skill or judgment to select or furnish 
suitable goods, there is unless excluded or modified under the next 
section an implied warranty that the goods shall be fit for such purpose.//
/http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/2/2-315.html

Cortland
KA5S


On 5/12/2013 1314, Larry Benko wrote:
> 100% agreement here.  I have posted this numerous times before and to 
> everyone contemplating the purchase of potential interference 
> producing devices WAKE  UP and write a REQUIREMENT THAT THE PRODUCT BE 
> RF INTERFERENCE FREE into the contract.  If possible reserve as much 
> of the payment until after installation and purchase with a credit 
> card in case of a contract dispute.  I even do this for appliances 
> such as dishwashers etc. at places like Lowes and Home Depot.  They 
> sometimes need the store manager to initial this addendum to the sales 
> agreement but they have never refused.
>
> In my opinion listening to a similar product is next to worthless as 
> an acceptance test.  The model you listen to might be slightly 
> different from the one you might get and the installation might be 
> significantly different from yours.
>
> My $.02.
>
> Larry, W0QE



More information about the RFI mailing list