[RFI] ARRL to FCC...

[CR]

Considering I got into EMC while the FCC was still "going to town" on 
enforcement, and doing its own testing too (complete with IIRC a frog 
under the 1-meter wooden turntable OATS outside their office), I agree 
with you.  Congress doesn't agree with either of us; if anything costs 
vendors more to comply with, they'll resist it, and if it is 
ineffectively or indifferently enforced, they'll ignore it and pay the 
fines when they must.

That is ONE reason I own my own spectrum analyzers, loop antennas, etc. 
now that I'm (mostly) retired.  It's warming up and I plan on covering a 
workbench in the barn with aluminum sheet to do lighting  conducted 
emission tests with.  Anyone want to trade two 5 uH's and one 650 uH 
LISN for two 50's?


Cortland
KA5S

On 3/31/2014 7:31 PM, Dale J. wrote:
> I don't see as being (or overly) rigorous. Some oversight should be implemented by an overseeing agency.  After all, this stuff is being imported, mfg here in the US and marketed to unsuspecting consumers, with their safety in the mix to boot.