[RFI] Fraudulent FCC RFI Certification

Dale J. dj2001x at comcast.net
Tue Feb 18 16:44:46 EST 2014

That was good, especially the last parts.

Tnx, 73
Dale, k9vuj

On 18, Feb 2014, at 15:21, CR <ka5s at earthlink.net> wrote:

> When I retired from the Army and went to work at Wang in 1983, it was in their TEMPEST audit lab, but we did FCC audits, too.   One new product -- we called it the Fredwriter -- was quite obviously above the Part 15 limits, and after I reported this, it was only a few weeks later that I got an angry call from a factory manager in China:
> "How come you close down my factory!?"
> I tried to tell him all I did was measure things, but I got the ball rolling to find out what had actually happened.  The case was upper and lower clamshells coated with copper bearing paint and snapped together, then secured with screws. The Chinese factory had some problems getting the halves to latch, so the factory manager talked to his buddy at the plastics factory and got cases made MINUS beveled interior features where the copper made contact, top to bottom...
> Something a bit like this -- likely unintentional and unasked for -- seems to have happened to a different firm where I worked later, when a fairly recent (this century) FCC Enforcement bulletin reported that one of its wireless remote controls was exceeding Part 15 radiated power limits. Interestingly enough, I had,  back in the day, devised a modification there, a piece of copper tape inside the case, to REDUCE the radiated power from a similar item my then-employer was importing.
> Scenario: Some guys in an Asian factory...
> First guy: "Hmm. What's this doing? Let's leave it off."
> Second guy: "Hey! It works better, too!"
> Production line supe: "Ship it!"
> Anyone doing FCC audits?  Heh.
> Cortland Richmond
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

More information about the RFI mailing list