[RFI] Question for all and ARRL

David Cole dave at nk7z.net
Mon May 19 21:57:29 EDT 2014


Interesting...  I really don't care what stops the RFI, as long as it

If only they would enforce here in Oregon, this entire issue would not
be costing me my radio for the past two years.  What's worse, I am not
the one who is getting hit hardest.  There is another ham who is very
close to the source, (which we will locate this summer), and he looses
160 through 10 meters 18 hours a day, every day now, with a 50 over S9

Same source is hitting me, and we are about 3/4 of a mile apart, it is
also hitting two other hams in teh area, all close to us as well.  

I believe there are now only two or three RFI generators left in the
area...  There were three others, they have been shut down, or ended
operation after being contacted.

Thanks and 73's,
For equipment, and software setups and reviews see:
for MixW support see;
for Dopplergram information see:
for MM-SSTV see:

On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 18:22 -0400, Cortland Richmond wrote:
> This about says it all:
> http://www.king5.com/news/local/Washgton-pot-growers-face-federal-charges-259821751.html
> When people ask me what I do for a living these days, I often point to grow-lights as radio beacons.
> Who knows? It might help.
> Cortland
> KA5S
> -----Original Message-----
> >From: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards at oppd.com>
> >Sent: May 19, 2014 4:51 PM
> >To: "'dave at nk7z.net'" <dave at nk7z.net>, "rfi at contesting.com" <rfi at contesting.com>
> >Subject: Re: [RFI] Question for all and ARRL
> >
> >I'm not sure if it is still active or not (haven't seen a post in awhile), but you might try running the legal question past the Ham-Law reflector on altlaw.com (ham-law-request at altlaw.com)
> >
> >Personally, I wouldn't do it, but grow lights are not illegal, and as long as...
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

More information about the RFI mailing list