[RFI] LED lighting

[David Cole]

Hi,

As I said, (and told the City folks), not scientific, had we had more
time I would have been able to do a proper test, but the lights are
already up and running...  I will do a few more drive by events as time
allows, and bring higher and higher frequency gear.

We came into this late.  This was just a sweep to be sure something was
not horribly wrong, not a definitive test, and it was presented as such
to the city.

-- 
Thanks and 73's,
For equipment, and software setups and reviews see:
www.nk7z.net

For MixW support see;
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/mixw/info
For Dopplergram information see:
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/dopplergram/info
For MM-SSTV see:
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/MM-SSTV/info


On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 13:06 -0400, qrv at kd4e.com wrote:
> David,
> 
> 	What about VHF, UHF, SHF?
> 
> 	No potential for weak signal GPS or WiFi interference?
> 
> David
> > I discovered that the City here is going to be switching to LED
> > streetlights soon, and ended up in contact with the City Engineer...
> > 
> > The long and short of it is that the city had not even thought about
> > Part 15/18 compliance, but when they looked, the lights were compliant
> > as per the data sheet on them.  
> > 
> > He and agreed to have us look over the test run they have in place
> > looking for RFI...  He gave us the addresses and we we did-- all of them
> > were dead quiet on 80-10 Meters, regarding broadband noise, in a drive
> > around test...  
> > 
> > We did a prelight drive around, mapping all the poles by number and
> > taking RF background readings, on 80-10, then waited for them to light,
> > and did it again...  Not one light made any detectable RFI, at street
> > level.  Not scientific, and I told him that, but at least the city is
> > being really good about RFI, and it is now on their radar.
> 
>