[RFI] RFI In My Shack

Dave Cole (NK7Z) dave at nk7z.net
Sat Dec 2 20:21:13 EST 2017


Hi Matt,

I agree totally with you, however, if I look at 20 random OCF dipoles, I 
find only three or four of them actually installed correctly, hence my 
comment, and suggestion it was an OCF, (which it is), in the first place.

With regards to antenna performance, I was not speaking about antenna 
performance with regards to DX, but performance with regards to RFI. 
The OP is actually burning things up in his shack, and destroying 
speakers, so I suspect that takes priority over DX at this point.  It 
also indicates a massive RFI issue.  I like OCF dipoles, if as you said, 
they are installed correctly with the proper chokes on them, which most 
are not.  With regards to the vertical or Dipole suggestion; that is to 
move the Op to an antenna that does not require quite as much choking as 
the OCF does.

I live by Jim's papers!  They have been the most useful work I have 
found for day to day solutions.  Take a look at Jim's talk here:

http://audiosystemsgroup.com/KillingRXNoiseVisalia.pdf

73s and thanks,
Dave
NK7Z
http://www.nk7z.net

On 12/02/2017 04:43 PM, Matthew King - KK4CPS wrote:
> Dave, there's nothing wrong with an OCFD *IF* it's fed properly, i.e.
> through *proper* baluns & chokes.  The fundamental band of the antenna (40
> or 80, for example) and the exact split make huge differences.
> 
> Clearly you've had a bad an experience with a bad OCFD if you think ANY
> vertical, even with decent radial field, will outplay it!  Having used
> both, I can tell you with certainty that it's simply not the case.
> 
> Read the links that I posted earlier in this thread and you can learn a
> lot. The OCFD can be an outstanding antenna, but not if it's thrown up over
> a roof with a 33%/67% split on 80m with a 4:1 voltage balun in it. THAT is
> a recipe for disaster!
> 
> Jim's publications on the subject illustrate *proper* chokes.  Check 'em
> out....
> 
> 73, y'all
> 
> Matt
> AK4MK
> 
> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 7:34 PM, Dave Cole (NK7Z) <dave at nk7z.net> wrote:
> 
>> I'm with Jim here...  This is a recipe for RFI...
>>
>> If it were me, I would replace the OCF dipole with almost anything else,
>> especially if you are running power.  That type of antenna causes more RFI
>> issues than almost any other type of antenna, save an end fed...
>>
>> You made a comment about needing the power to get out, that might indicate
>> an antenna issue, so maybe replacing the OCF with a good vertical and a
>> decent radial field, or a dipole, up as high as possible, is in order
>> here...
>>
>> 73s and thanks,
>> Dave
>> NK7Z
>> http://www.nk7z.net
>>
>> On 12/02/2017 02:50 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/2/2017 1:59 PM, Joe wrote:
>>>
>>>> I use coax as a feed, not twin lead.  Twin lead will not survive 100 mph
>>>> winds, which are common at my location.
>>>>
>>>
>>> N6BV, retired ARRL Antenna Book and Handbook editor, wrote a great piece
>>> that ran in QST about two years ago showing that even with coax, a choke
>>> will fry very quickly when feeding an antenna not matched to the feedline
>>> (that is, up in the air).
>>>
>>> 73, Jim K9YC
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RFI mailing list
>>> RFI at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RFI mailing list
>> RFI at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>>
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> 


More information about the RFI mailing list