[RFI] Daisy chain vs Common Ground in Shack

Roger (K8RI) k8ri at rogerhalstead.com
Mon Jun 12 17:44:21 EDT 2017


Yup.  I strip abt the last 3/4" of jacket and dielectric, twist the 
braid tight onto the exposed center conductor, crimp a ring or spade 
terminal onto the end and then coat the exposed braid with liquid 
electrical tape.  I often neglect the liquid tape in the den or shop as 
they are temperature and humidity controlled. (If I remember to empty 
the dehumidifiers.) Solder can be used at the terminal as there 
shouldn't be a vibration or flexing problem.

73, Roger (K8RI)

On 6/8/2017 Thursday 8:50 AM, Sean Waite wrote:
>
> Hi Roger,
>
> What connectors do you use when running 8X as ground wire? Do you 
> squeeze the stripped braid into a ring terminal?
>
> Sean WA1TE
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017, 01:58 Roger (K8RI) <k8ri at rogerhalstead.com 
> <mailto:k8ri at rogerhalstead.com>> wrote:
>
>     I downloaded your tutorials a while back, but haven't read the one on
>     grounding. It makes sense to me as using a common ground is installing
>     two grounds of different lengths. One being the ground line to the
>     common point (Not CPG) and the other being the coax shields in a Daisy
>     Chain.  For more than two items, the ground currents / paths, can be
>     quite complex,
>     In the shack, why not leave the coax in tact. That way the braid is
>     protected except at the very ends.  I strip the ends just far enough
>     back to be able to crimp the connectors on.  I coat any exposed braid
>     from the jacket onto the end of the crimp-on connector.  I've used
>     RG8X
>     and 8X-LL for some years. This allowed me to have the ground line very
>     close to the lengths of the coax cables.  I do not solder into the
>     crimp-on. That works well in aircraft where soldered connections are
>     prohibited due to vibration except in specific connectors.
>
>     The recent common wisdom had me working on changing that, but now I'm
>     going back to Daisy Chaining. Thanks for bringing it up, Sean and
>     thanks
>     Jim for the work on grounding.
>
>     73, Roger (K8RI)
>
>     On 6/7/2017 Wednesday 9:08 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
>     > On Wed,6/7/2017 2:55 PM, Sean Waite wrote:
>     >> Hi Jim,
>     >>
>     >> I was hoping you might respond. I've read a lot of your slides and
>     >> papers and have started sharing them out (along with W1HIS's
>     article
>     >> on chokes) when people ask about RFI. I saw that book, but wasn't
>     >> sure if there was much in there about RF grounding that wasn't
>     >> already available on your site. I may have to pick up a copy, I
>     have
>     >> a few other grounding questions that it might answer.
>     >>
>     >> Everything I've read of yours makes a lot of sense, the only
>     reason I
>     >> questioned it was because it strays directly against conventional
>     >> wisdom. Considering how many hams consider RFI and grounding to be
>     >> some sort of magic, it's not terribly surprising that there is bad
>     >> information out there. Just today I saw a thread with someone
>     >> recommending that when men have to answer the "call of nature" that
>     >> they go out and periodically water the ground rod to increase the
>     >> soil salinity and conductivity.
>     >>
>     >> Is there ever a case where the star bond is the correct one?
>     >
>     > There is FAR more to my tutorial (and to Ward's book) than how
>     > equipment is bonded in the shack. ALL of it is important.
>     >
>     >> Is there an evidence based counter to the methods you suggest?
>     >
>     > Not that I know of.  My recommendations, as well as Ward's, are
>     based
>     > on the total picture -- power, lightning, fire and personal safety,
>     > audio, RFI, and all sorts of other systems.
>     >
>     >> Given the thoroughness of your research and the implied backing of
>     >> the ARRL through NOAX's book, it seems like daisy chaining
>     really is
>     >> the right way to go though. If I'm reading your slides
>     correctly, you
>     >> recommend stripping the braid off of the coax linking devices like
>     >> the transceiver, tuner, and switches? Does this remove the need for
>     >> common mode chokes on the same pieces of coax?
>     >
>     > I don't know where you got that idea. The answer is NO. What I DO
>     > recommend is using braid stripped from coax for indoor bonding. Ward
>     > does NOT recommend that, because he feels that the copper is more
>     > likely to oxidize when exposed to air (rather than remaining inside
>     > the insulation provided by the coax jacket). When I use braid in
>     that
>     > manner, I usually enclose it in heat shrink to minimize that
>     possibility.
>     >
>     >>
>     >> It's taken me a few readthroughs of your material to digest it,
>     and I
>     >> had everything in the shack disconnected anyway so it was a
>     good time
>     >> to redo the ground.
>     >
>     > 73, Jim
>     >>
>     >> The great part about this hobby is that there is always more
>     learning
>     >> to do. Thanks for the reply,
>     >> Sean WA1TE
>     >>
>     >> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 5:19 PM Jim Brown
>     <jim at audiosystemsgroup.com <mailto:jim at audiosystemsgroup.com>
>     >> <mailto:jim at audiosystemsgroup.com
>     <mailto:jim at audiosystemsgroup.com>>> wrote:
>     >>
>     >>     Sean,
>     >>
>     >>     In the new ARRL book on Grounding and Bonding, you will find me
>     >>     credited
>     >>     as a contributor,  you will find my methods cited, and you will
>     >> find a
>     >>     link to the slides for my tutorial on the topic. The book
>     is by Ward
>     >>     Silver, N0AX, who also edits the ARRL Handbook and Antenna
>     Book.
>     >>
>     >>     The primary my recommendation differs from prior "wisdom"
>     on the
>     >> topic
>     >>     is that the prior wisdom ignored the issue of leakage current
>     >> from the
>     >>     AC power system, which is how power line "buzz" couples into
>     >> equipment
>     >>     that is interconnected with other equipment. That prior wisdom
>     >> depends
>     >>     on the fictional concept of a "ground loop" as the cause of
>     that
>     >> buzz,
>     >>     ignores the fact that the shield of audio cables between
>     equipment
>     >>     creates a loop with a "star ground," and is ignorant of a
>     widespread
>     >>     cause of both buzz and RFI called "The Pin One Problem."
>     >>
>     >>     My method solves all of those problems, AND satisfies
>     grounding and
>     >>     bonding requirements for RF and lightning protection.
>     >>
>     >>     FACT -- the ONLY way in which a LOOP affects a system is if
>     it is
>     >> in a
>     >>     magnetic field (from a poorly shielded power transformer,
>     or in a
>     >>     place
>     >>     with improper AC wiring). In both of those situations, the
>     received
>     >>     noise will be pure 60 Hz (hum) not buzz (triplen harmonics
>     of 60
>     >> Hz --
>     >>     180, 360, 540, 720, etc).
>     >>
>     >>     73, Jim K9YC
>     >>
>     >>     On Wed,6/7/2017 12:50 PM, Sean Waite wrote:
>     >>     > Hi everyone,
>     >>     >
>     >>     > I was reading through a lot of K9YC's articles on
>     grounding and
>     >>     RFI. It
>     >>     > seems that he recommends daisy chaining ground together
>     in the
>     >>     shack, and
>     >>     > then running a single cable from the last point out to the
>     >>     common house
>     >>     > ground. His reasoning seems sound (combined with choking off
>     >> coax to
>     >>     > eliminate ground loops), but it goes against everything
>     you hear
>     >>     about
>     >>     > station grounding.
>     >>     >
>     >>     > Is this the correct thing to do? Am I just misreading
>     what he's
>     >>     writing? A
>     >>     > lot of RFI topics seem to be borderline magic in the ham
>     >>     community and I'm
>     >>     > trying to unravel the myth from reality.
>     >>     >
>     >>     > Thanks and 73,
>     >>     > Sean Waite, WA1TE
>     >>     > _______________________________________________
>     >>     > RFI mailing list
>     >>     > RFI at contesting.com <mailto:RFI at contesting.com>
>     <mailto:RFI at contesting.com <mailto:RFI at contesting.com>>
>     >>     > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>     >>     >
>     >>
>     >>     _______________________________________________
>     >>     RFI mailing list
>     >> RFI at contesting.com <mailto:RFI at contesting.com>
>     <mailto:RFI at contesting.com <mailto:RFI at contesting.com>>
>     >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>     >>
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > RFI mailing list
>     > RFI at contesting.com <mailto:RFI at contesting.com>
>     > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>     >
>
>
>     ---
>     This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>     https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     RFI mailing list
>     RFI at contesting.com <mailto:RFI at contesting.com>
>     http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>




More information about the RFI mailing list