[RFI] Keyboard
Gary Smith
wa6fgi at steeltrails.net
Sun Mar 4 12:33:11 EST 2018
Tongue in cheek here, how bout out to the antenna?
Gary...wa6fgi
On 3/3/2018 4:16 PM, Joe wrote:
> Hi Jim,
> You ask
> "What is the RF path for antenna switching in the SB220?"
>
> Not sure what you are meaning to ask here. Please clarify.
>
> Joe WB9SBD
>
> Sig
> The Original Rolling Ball Clock
> Idle Tyme
> Idle-Tyme.com
> http://www.idle-tyme.com
> On 3/3/2018 4:40 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
>> On 3/3/2018 12:09 PM, Joe wrote:
>>> BUT I may have fixed it by accident. I have been in the process or
>>> bringing an old dead SB-220 back to life, and have put it inplace
>>> this morning, so cabling has changed greatly in the shack. And the
>>> problem may be gone now by just changing out all the cables?
>>
>> Lots of problems like this are caused by a bad piece of coax, or coax
>> with a poor shield connection (or no shield connection). Under normal
>> operation, current on the center conductor returns on the shield, so
>> the field stays within the coax. When there's no shield connection,
>> current returns on whatever path Mother Nature finds, and there's a
>> strong field OUTSIDE the coax. That field radiates, and also
>> magnetically (inductively) couples to anything around it.
>>
>> What is the RF path for antenna switching in the SB220? Many unwashed
>> engineers used the chassis as return rather than running coax. This
>> creates the same sort of problem inside the amp -- current returns on
>> the chassis rather than the coax shield, so it produces EM and
>> magnetic fields. GOOD amp designers use coax for everything in the RF
>> path.
>>
>> 73, Jim K9YC
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RFI mailing list
>> RFI at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>
More information about the RFI
mailing list