[RFI] Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI

KD7JYK DM09 kd7jyk at earthlink.net
Sun Dec 15 19:23:55 EST 2019


"but for loss of enjoyment, and all those other fun things that lawyers 
sue for. Then let HIM end up suing Tesla to recover his money"

True.  In this state we have a statute covering, "Anything which is 
injurious to health, or indecent and offensive to the senses, or an 
obstruction to the free use of property, so as to interfere with the 
comfortable enjoyment of life or property; is a nuisance, and the 
subject of an action. The action may be brought by any person whose 
property is injuriously affected, or whose personal enjoyment is 
lessened by the nuisance, and by the judgment the nuisance may be 
enjoined or abated, as well as damages recovered."

That allows a civil case against the offending party.  Doesn't matter if 
someone else installed it, it was for the person that is causing 
offense, the end user is responsible to eliminate it. Additionally, part 
15, beyond the above statute, states shut the system down upon 
notification of interference.  So, inform, expect no noise by the time 
you get home.  How, doesn't matter, so long as it ceases to exist.  Not 
in an hour, not next week, as soon as the issue is announced.  They can 
burn their panels down, or shoot the optimizers, doesn't matter, just 
the end result, to ensure compliance.

In short, their existence may not be at the expense of others, they have 
no special privileges, or immunity, nor the right to affect others.

Kurt



More information about the RFI mailing list