[RFI] FW: Sweden imposes higher levy on electricity bills for EMC | Southgate Amateur Radio News
qrv at kd4e.com
qrv at kd4e.com
Thu Dec 30 09:22:40 EST 2021
You already pay tons of taxes for your government, which is supposed to
serve you - not the other way around - to deal with this mess.
And if you believe that giving them $600. will solve the problem - you
don't understand the way that bureaucracy works.
There will always be a new excuse for not solving the problem - and a
new fee (or fee increase).
Tell your elected representatives to enforce existing law, or fix it,
then use the massive resources they already have to get it done - or
lose the next election.
That's how problems, that cross property lines, are addressed.
David KD4E
> Joe,
>
> Am I willing to pay more for a clean RF environment, yes! I would
> happily pay $600/year for a clean RF spectrum.
>
> The problem is filtering devices stop very little, no matter what the
> quality when used at the receiving site. Why? Filtering the RF at
> the receiving end simply does not work in most cases.
>
> If I can't get to the devices causing the issues, then I can't filter
> them, and if I can get to the device, then there is the liability
> issue afterwards...
>
> So to answer your original question, yes, if my bill were to go up, I
> would be fine. As I mentioned, upthread, fine hell out of the
> offenders, the vendors, and the manufacturers, and the problem would
> be reduced greatly. Charge them for the location and time involved,
> plus a hefty fine per occurrence.
>
> In general start throwing far more roadblocks to the sale, and use of
> EMI emitting devices then there are currently.
>
> 73, and thanks,
> Dave (NK7Z)
More information about the RFI
mailing list