[RFI] Another Solar Panel Interference Case

[David Eckhardt]

QUOTE W2TTT, GORDON:  " As for VZW and AT&T staffing, there are
surprisingly few engineers
                                 available and equipped to troubleshoot
noise and other forms of interference, but they
                                 do an excellent job when tackling a
reported issue.  Keep in mind that their networks
                                 (wired and wireless) are often impacted by
issues with SMPSs and solar panels in
                                 particular.  The trick is to recognize,
measure, isolate and mitigate those issues.  These
                                 networks are massive with millions of
components and even with comprehensive
                                 monitoring, there are things that can be
below the radar or be ambiguous as to their
                                 cause without correlation or further
investigation."

So, VZW and AT&T (and others) have joined ARRL in doing the job of FCC.
Whether it's private industry or ARRL, we all pay for this "service".  But,
isn't this what FCC was originally chartered to do??

When it comes to SMPS from China, FCC allows them to sail through Customs
with no attention paid to EMC/RFI.  FCC allows the integrator to be held
responsible for the EMC solution when these SMPSs are incorporated into
products.  Once sold to a consumer, the consumer becomes responsible (solar
power et.al.).  What a "pass-the-buck" approach by FCC!  And FCC has
allowed all home appliances to go Scott free w.r.t. EMC/RFI.  Again, what a
scam on the part of FCC.  FCC is NOT..... N-O-T ....fulfilling its
chartered duties.  We are all paying directly or indirectly for this
shirking of responsibilities on the part of the FCC.

Again, this could have been avoided for the most part, if FCC had done due
dilligence during the early days of the digital revolution.  They did very
little (even when they had more clout!!  And, yes, OET has been gutted.

Dave - WØLEV

On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 6:40 PM EDWARDS, EDDIE J via RFI <rfi at contesting.com>
wrote:

> And the internet as well, which is less reliable than the geographically
> distributed AM/FM broadcast sites.
> But lawyers aren't worried about reliability of communications.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: RFI <rfi-bounces+eedwards=oppd.com at contesting.com> On Behalf Of
> MICHAEL ST ANGELO
> Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 12:05 PM
> To: Rfi List <rfi at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel Interference Case
>
> READ THIS FIRST! This is NOT an OPPD email.Be very cautious of any links
> or  attachments unless you recognize this sender - rfi-bounces+eedwards=
> oppd.com at contesting.com and are expecting this email.Please click the
> "Report it" button if you think this email is malicious.
>
> Many AM station bother staying on the because they can on operate on the
> FM  band via a FM translator license.
>
> Mike N2MS
>
> > On 04/05/2022 12:53 PM David Eckhardt <davearea51a at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > And the "official" reply from FCC to the impacted (RFI) coverage areas
> > for AM BC, "Increase your output power."  Sure.....Yea......That costs
> > the BCer money both for a new transmitter and continuing additional
> > fees to pay the electric bill.
> >
> > Yes, where is the FCC??
> >
> > Dave - WØLEV
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI at contesting.com
>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi__;!!AvPafw!axsJmUZ-JymMhOEXjl0z35QdDZWotp6LdAIPH8EODYuVVDVliviyrbPIo2bJaA$
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>


-- 
*Dave - WØLEV*
*Just Let Darwin Work*