[RFI] Starlink as unintentional radiators...

[James Jordan]

Can we not stick to our own science and get off the “can’t trust anyone but xxxx“ soapboxes?
If polluters can be verified, call them out. “What about….” never solves anything. 
Other than the cool light show when the Starlink train goes by, I know nothing but because it’s visible, verification or lack thereof should be doable. 
73,
Jim K4QPL 


Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 20, 2023, at 4:20 PM, VE3FH via RFI <rfi at contesting.com> wrote:
> 
>  Because he has the bad habit of making biased left-leaning political statements in a ham radio reflector. In past posts he cited CNN, NPR, NYT and the like as beacons of truth, that paints the picture :|
> 
> 73,Julio VE3FH
>    On Friday, October 20, 2023 at 03:30:48 p.m. EDT, Wes Stewart via RFI <rfi at contesting.com> wrote:  
> 
>  Why do you give them a pass on medicine and climate?  They don't know anything about those either.
> The "scientists" aren't much better, judging by the number of "peer-reviewed" papers that get retracted.
> Wes  N7WS
> 
>     On Friday, October 20, 2023 at 11:22:50 AM MST, Jim Brown <jim at audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote: 
> 
> Most of the press, even the best of them, are pretty ignorant of 
> anything approaching science outside the world of medicine and climate.  
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi