[RTTY] RE: the best SOUNDCARD one? [NEW]

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 17:48:52 -0500

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C1A84D.F55E2320
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"

Surprisingly not many responses on this! 

Actually, it got me to asking which is the best soundcard-based RTTY
program.  I'm seeing lots and lots on MMTTY and allusions to it being quite
good.  Also, I'm surprised to see nothing on RITTY by K6STI -- version 4.5
is about a year old now, and runs with Writelog.  Isn't RITTY reputed to be
comparable with the best of the hardware TNCs?

So new question: What's the best soundcard RTTY program?

Thanks,
Vic K1PY

------_=_NextPart_001_01C1A84D.F55E2320
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2654.89">
<TITLE>RE: the best SOUNDCARD one? [NEW]</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

Surprisingly not many responses on this!

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Actually, it got me to asking which is the best =
soundcard-based RTTY program.&nbsp; I'm seeing lots and lots on MMTTY =
and allusions to it being quite good.&nbsp; Also, I'm surprised to see =
nothing on RITTY by K6STI -- version 4.5 is about a year old now, and =
runs with Writelog.&nbsp; Isn't RITTY reputed to be comparable with the =
best of the hardware TNCs?</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>So new question: What's the best soundcard RTTY =
program?</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Thanks,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Vic K1PY</FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>

</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C1A84D.F55E2320--