[RTTY] ARRL Proposal to redefine subbands by bandwidth

[Frank Hunt]

I whole-heartedly agree - MT63 is an excellent 1kHz bandwidth almost 
error-fee, person-to-person chat public domain software digital mode.

Whereas Pactor III is a 2.5kHz bandwidth error-free, expensive 
commercial mode mostly used by auto stations who qrm everyone else.

73, Frank ZL2BR

> MT-63 isn't obnoxious.  It is a fun mode and normally found above 14.000.
> Those auto-pactor MSO's  are the real interference, not MT63.
> 
> WB4M
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "John Fleming" <john at wa9als.com>
> To: <rtty at contesting.com>
> Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2004 1:18 PM
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] ARRL Proposal to redefine subbands by bandwidth
> 
> 
> > > I think this is a false alarm.  As it is now, the PIII stations could
> > legally
> > > operate down in the PSK and RTTY segments, and PII MBO's already do.
> > > This would add restrictions to that.  It also moves that most obnoxious
> of
> > > digital modes, MT63, out of the narrow band area.
> >
> > I tend to agree, as long as the ones in the RTTY area don't multiply much.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > RTTY mailing list
> > RTTY at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>