[RTTY] Fw: ARLB025 ARRL seeks comment on draft "Bandwidth"petition

[7L4IOU]

Hi Bill

I agree with you. 
It is important for each other to know a partner's situation. 
I appreciate your attention. 

btw
It was very nice to QSO with you and many NA's on 40m
in the SARTG 3rd period.
CUL on SCC

73, Hisami 7L4IOU

>On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:48:15 -0500, Don Hill AA5AU wrote:
>
>>I read this as a good thing.  Anyone else?
>>
>>Don AA5AU 
>
>_________________________________________________________
>
>I like it too.  One small problem is we would no longer be able to use
>conventional RTTY in the JA RTTY segment on 80 (3520-3525).  Not a big deal
>, we
>could work them using a wide split, but something to consider.  One 
>alternative
>would be to try using narrower shifts on RTTY, perhaps on the order of 50 
>Hz or
>so.  There are some technical reasons why this is not a good idea, but 
>perhaps
>they can be overcome.
>
>Well worth reading, everyone!!
>
>--
>Bill, W6WRT
>QSLs via LoTW
>
>_______________________________________________
>RTTY mailing list
>RTTY at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty