[RTTY] Correction & Apologies
Jim Preston
jpreston1 at cox.net
Sat Oct 2 11:35:28 EDT 2004
Yes, but CQ-WW-RTTY goes in the CONTEST: field, not in the CAREGORY:
field. Notice that the only options for mode-category in the CATEGORY:
field are CW, SSB or MIXED. The problem is that Writelog was putting
RTTY in the CATEGORY: field. This part of the specification should
probably be changed.
73,
Jim N6VH
Dave W7DPW wrote:
> According to the specifications: CQ-WW-RTTY is correct , see the
> following:
>
> http://www.kkn.net/~trey/cabrillo/spec.html
>
> Dave W7DPW
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au at bellsouth.net>
> To: <RTTY at contesting.com>
> Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2004 6:15 AM
> Subject: [RTTY] Correction & Apologies
>
>
>
>>A statement in one of my earlier posts may have the wrong
>
> perception.
>
>>When I stated that I had to remove the word RTTY from the Category
>
> in my
>
>>Cabrillo file before the CQ Robot would accept it, I did not mean to
>
> imply that
>
>>there was anything wrong with the Robot. There is nothing wrong
>
> with the robot.
>
>>There is a standard for Cabrillo files and there should be. The
>
> Robot accepts
>
>>Cabrillo files that adhere to that standard.
>>
>>WriteLog incorrectly puts RTTY in the category field. I have
>
> written Ron and
>
>>Wayne and asked that this be corrected.
>>
>>My apologies to the crew at CQ for any misperception on the robot.
>>
>>73, Don AA5AU
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>RTTY mailing list
>>RTTY at contesting.com
>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
More information about the RTTY
mailing list