[RTTY] QSO B4
Jim Martin - MM0BQI
MM0BQI at blueyonder.co.uk
Tue Sep 28 14:23:21 EDT 2004
Why Do it?
One reason is that if you don't log the correct suffix the LOTW will bomb
out the QSO and it will not match up!
Having just processed 1000 QSL cards from previous IOTA DXpeditions I would
say about 20% logged me without the suffix. Okay for paper QSLs but LOTW
gives no quarter if the callsign is not exact.
BTW I used N1MMLogger last weekend and had no problems with it picking up
the full call.
73
Jim MM0BQI / MM0Q
-----Original Message-----
From: rtty-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces at contesting.com]On
Behalf Of Bill Turner
Sent: 28 September 2004 16:15
To: rtty at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] QSO B4
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:32:25 EDT, W0YR at aol.com wrote:
>I worked KM4M on 20 and they called me later and tried to work me again. I
>gave them the time I'd work them and sure enough, later got a message that
>they'd inadvertantly left the /4 off my call when logging. (That tells me
someone
>was MANUALLY entering callsigns !!!! ??? a great source of errors.)
_________________________________________________________
I had to manually enter the /x on several calls during the contest and
I'm wondering why the stations sent the /x in the first place?
It's not required by the FCC.
It's not required by the contest rules.
It slows things down.
So why do it?
--
Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.769 / Virus Database: 516 - Release Date: 24/09/2004
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.769 / Virus Database: 516 - Release Date: 24/09/2004
More information about the RTTY
mailing list