[RTTY] RTTY Software

[ws7i]

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm at comcast.net>
Date:  Sun, 3 Jul 2005 22:30:12 -0400

It ain't dead...I"m just hibernating!

WF1B and RITTY is still mychoice for SO?R RTTY...as long as I can keep my 
old W98 computers running and you cant run Writelog strictly from a 
keyboard.

I did use MMTTY and Digipan for Field Day because they are relatively easy 
to setup on a new computer, but they are both slower to use for a good 
keyboardist.  I hate meeces to pieces!

Ty you probably still use a key in parallel for CW contests as well :-)  However, pray tell what do you need a mice for to run
Writelog?  I use 4 function keys and type, and I have been using Writelog for years and years and years.

Now tell me about that key....as I ran CT in FD, they had a key all hooked up as well. I had to show they keyboard Cw!  Of course being left handed and them having only a right hand keyer might have had something to do with it.

73 Jay


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Turner" <dezrat1242 at ispwest.com>
To: <ws7i at ewarg.org>; "Andrew J. O'Brien" <obrienaj at netsync.net>; 
<rtty at contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2005 1:03 PM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY Software


> At 09:12 AM 7/3/2005, ws7i wrote:
>>DOS died about 10 years ago along with WF1B.  Which is why RITTY is no
>>longer much of a program for "normal" RTTY users as most are running
>>Windows for the last 10 plus years.
>
> If you read contest reports carefully, you will see some folks are still
> using RTTY by WF1B. "Dead" is a relative term, apparently. ;-)
>
>
>>MMTTY is a pretty good choice.
>
> Agreed. MMTTY is what I use for contesting on the main computer because it
> integrates with Windows contesting programs, not because it is the best.
> "Pretty good" is adequate for many applications, but is not the same as 
> "best".
>
> Brian told me years ago that he could not get a Windows version of RITTY 
> to
> work as well as the DOS version because he could not address the sound 
> card
> directly and that causes some timing and/or latency issues. (I am
> paraphrasing here; those may not be his exact words.) In his opinion,
> Windows would never be as good as DOS for this kind of thing.  Direct
> addressing of the sound card is why RITTY has such specific hardware
> requirements.
>
> That was MANY years ago however, and things could change. As far as I 
> know,
> they haven't.
>
> -- 
> Bill, W6WRT
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.8/37 - Release Date: 7/1/2005
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> 


_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by F-Prot]


 

[This E-mail scanned for viruses by F-Prot]