[RTTY] 4U1UN

[AD5VJ Bob]

> IMHO, if a station indicates their QSX frequency, that is 
> where they should listen, not on their own transmit frequency?
> 

 Agreed but they don't. 

That's exactly why dual receive is so important to us all. Art is right if you can get it dual receive is great to have. 

Personally after having dual receive on my IC-775 and on a previous FT-920 and IC-756PRO, IMHO I think it should be standard
equipment on anything out there today.

Tell em to keep the bandscopes :0)

  73 fer nw,
Bob AD5VJ(AAR6VM)
http://www.ad5vj.com/

Member CTDXCC
10X# 37210, FP#-1141
SMIRK#-5177, RARS #-149

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtty-bounces at contesting.com 
> [mailto:rtty-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Shelby Summerville
> Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2006 2:13 PM
> To: rtty at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] 4U1UN
> 
> Art Searle W2NRA wrote: "I was chasing 4U1UN today on 20m 
> RTTY.  With every spot I tuned to the freq and nothing there. 
>  I did eventually find him calling CQ on 14094.6.  He said up 
> 1 to 2.  I called him up 1 and 95.6.  He came to me on 95.6 
> and I finished the exchange on that frequency simplex.
> That probably explains why I couldn't find him on any of the 
> spots.  My point to this post is I worked him because I'm 
> dual receive RTTY.  Just thought I'd tout dual receive RTTY again."
> 
> I would say that this had far more to do with the inability 
> of the 4U1UN operator to  listen where he said he would be 
> listening, than "dual receive RTTY"? Why would he move to 
> your frequency, instead of continuing to operate split?
> IMHO, if a station indicates their QSX frequency, that is 
> where they should listen, not on their own transmit frequency?
> 
> C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>