[RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 57, Issue 31

[Joe Subich, W4TV]

> I must have missed the post where someone was advocating 
> denying top operators the right to participate against
>  anyone.

You weren't paying attention to the demands that SO2R be made 
a separate category (whether it be a separate category for 
SO2R or a category for "SO1R ONLY" the effect is the same). 

> Want a contest based on "skill, skill, skill?" Check with 
> with NAQCC. Lets see, QRP power, CW, and basic wire antennas 
> at the bottom of the sunspot cycle. Now there's a contest!

Not hardly - that's masochism.  It's like trying to dig the 
Grand Canyon with a tea spoon or repairing a HT with a blow 
torch.    



> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtty-bounces at contesting.com 
> [mailto:rtty-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of billknn at aol.com
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 9:00 PM
> To: rtty at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 57, Issue 31
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "...If you would deny a certain group of top operators 
> the right to participate against ALL single operator stations 
> because one of the tools they choose is SO2R,..."
> 
>         
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I must have missed the post where someone was advocating 
> denying top operators the right to participate against
>  anyone.
> Want a contest based on "skill, skill, skill?" Check with 
> with NAQCC. Lets see, QRP power, CW, and basic wire antennas 
> at the bottom of the sunspot cycle. Now there's a contest!
> 73 de KD5XN
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
> Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free 
> AOL Mail! - http://mail.aol.com
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> 
>