[RTTY] SO1U Re: CQ-Contest SO2R (Longish, but (I think) Scintillating)
sjolin
sjolin at swbell.net
Wed Sep 19 13:17:26 EDT 2007
Bill, why don't you create a website and post all you want about SO2R, pros
and cons. This is getting tiring. Do you really think you are going to
change anyone's mind, one way or the other? This is just mental masturbation
pretending to be debate.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Turner" <dezrat at copper.net>
To: "John Fleming" <john at wa9als.com>
Cc: <rtty at contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] SO1U Re: CQ-Contest SO2R (Longish,but (I think)
Scintillating)
> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 22:50:36 -0400, "John Fleming" <john at wa9als.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Whatever tools the winners are using, within the
>>rules mind you, some people will be trying to limit.
>
> ------------ REPLY FOLLOWS ------------
>
> I can't believe you said that, John. Nobody wants to limit SO2R. We
> just believe it is fair to have separate SO1R and SO2R classes. Feel
> free to enter which ever you like.
>
> Bill W6WRT
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
More information about the RTTY
mailing list