[RTTY] WPX thoughts
Vilnis YL2KF
yl2kf at arrl.net
Mon Feb 11 14:40:42 EST 2008
>>
>> Just a few thoughts about WPX that I have been thinking about.
>>
>> Was it just me, or were there a lot of stations sending a report before they
>> had even been acknowledged?
>> I frequently encountered this:
>> CQ WPX DE GU0SUP CQ
>> TU UR 599 001 001 DE XX1XX KN
>> XX1XX TU 599 100 100 100 DE GU0SUP
>> and then nothing back! What does everyone else do in situations like this? I
>> logged them, but I am not too happy with this.
>>
>>
Hi Phil and all ,
Ohhh, Yes, quite a common, still. This is definitely not a "fat finger"
syndrome.
There is some other diagnosis - "ithinkiamfastandclever" or arount that
:-) .
Personally I have one macro for that - I NEED YOUR CALL ONLY -
and do not give report for him. Don't ask how is labeled this macro ;-) .
Only "medicine" is to teach a PSKers (sorry) to read more and promote
a good
RTTY contesting (bdw also DXing) practice not only in Don 's AA5AU homepage.
73
Vilnis / YL2KF
>> The cluster: As always, some folk send spots based on their rig frequency,
>> not the MARK frequency.
>> Most times, this isn't a problem, but over the weekend, I encountered a few
>> instances where I was running on the frequency of a spot that came through
>> for another call.
>> I then ended up with this:
>> CQ WPX DE GU0SUP CQ
>> DE XX1XX XX1XX KN
>> XX1XX TU 599 100 100 100 DE GU0SUP
>> AA5AU TU UR 599 001 001 DE XX1XX KN
>> And then they were gone before I could get them to correct my call! Again,
>> what does everyone else do?
>>
>>
>
More information about the RTTY
mailing list