[RTTY] CQWW exchange

[Vilnis Vosekalns]

Hello Peter,

Yes and no , depend from situation but normally not needed three times ,
only two is o.k.
if I can not copy , I  can not copy also 5 or 7 times not.
If everybody start using "longer is better" theory we just get a full
band with callers and
no listeners, right.
No, I think tray with two first . Normal OP asking for partial call to
repeat or, if no partial, asking QRZ?
or wait for next call or some other callers after You.  I think for good
signal two is o.k.  for a little
bad propogation also two is o.k. , only on 80 band  in static crash QRM
preferable is three.
So, that my "theory"  :-)

73
Vilnis / YL2KF

Peter Laws wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 16:44, Vilnis YL2KF <yl2kf at arrl.net> wrote:
>
>   
>> So, three times call sounds stupid, agree,
>>     
>
>
> If you receive N5UWY and N9UWY, which is correct?
>
> If you receive N5UWY, N9UWY, and N5UWY, which is correct?
>
> Three is better than two.
>
>