[RTTY] QSL survey

[Jan Palmquist]

SM5FUG:

1. Yes

2. No. One electronic log book is enough for
me and I don't like to encourage a second.

3. Yes. I send cards for ragchew QSOs and I reply
to all cards I receive this way.

4. Yes, for stations I need QSL from that only use direct
route. If somebody sends a direct QSL to me he/she will get a reply
direct if postage is enclosed.

5.
LoTW:  25% new QSOs, 14% in total from my start on the air 1972.
eQSL: I don't know
Bureau: 15% last years, higher earlier.
Direct: 1%

I work a mixture of RTTY-contests, CW-contests, local Swedish contests,
DX-hunting and ragchew QSOs. The propotion of RTTY-contests has decreased
the last years since I changed QTH and only (so far) use wire antennas.

73's de Jan

> Although this may be a bit off-topic, I hope that it is not objectionable.  I am conducting an informal survey of QSLing methods and would very much appreciate your input. Please respond directly to me. 
> 
> 1. Do you use the Logbook of the World (LOTW)?
> If not, what has kept you from using it?
> 
> 2. Do you use the eQSL service? 
> If not, what has kept you from using it?
> 
> 3. Do you use the QSL Bureau system? 
> If not, what has kept you from using it?
> 
> 4. Do you send out direct QSLs? 
> If not, what has kept you from doing so?
> 
> 5. What is the approximate percentages of your QSLs received via:
> LOTW 
> eQSL
> Bureau
> Direct
> 
> Thanks very much for your participation. Any additional comments are welcome.
> 
> 73,
> Don W5FKX
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>