[RTTY] Dashes in Contest Reports

WS7I ws7i at ewarg.org
Tue Jan 26 13:46:50 PST 2010


Exactly, and hitting the correct function key to fix 599-03 is far easier than hitting it just for the 3.  Perhaps we should just get rid of the 599's!!!!




---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert at alum.mit.edu>
Date:  Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:25:27 -0700

>
>On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Bill, W6WRT <dezrat1242 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> What Chen ignores is the case where the FIGS shift character before
>> the 599 is lost or garbled. When that happens and the dash is present,
>> the receiving station will print TOOAE. If the dash were NOT present
>> and USOS was enabled as it should be, under the same conditions  the
>> receiving station would print TOO 3.
>>
>> So which is better, TOOAE or TOO 3? To me, the choice is obvious.
>
>Bill, what you don't seem to get, and which Chen has argued in the
>past, is that the error WILL NOT necessarily occur on the first FIGS.
>Your solution is to transmit MORE FIGS/LTRS characters, all of which
>have as likely a chance of being corrupted as the first one.
>
>MTBF, or mean time between/before failure, is a fixed quantity.  When
>you INCREASE the number of transmitted characters, the MTBF stays the
>same, but the likelihood of experiencing a failure INCREASES.
>
>I'm with Chen on this one.  Send the MINIMUM number of characters
>required, and you'll minimize the absolute number of errors.
>
>73 - Jim AD1C
>
>-- 
>Jim Reisert AD1C, <jjreisert at alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.us
>_______________________________________________
>RTTY mailing list
>RTTY at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>[This E-mail scanned for viruses by ClamAV]
>
>
 




 
                   

[This E-mail scanned for viruses by ClamAV]



More information about the RTTY mailing list