[RTTY] Response to DX Station

[Rich NU6T]

Sometimes the problem is that one man's lid is another man's Elmer.


Rich
NU6T
Strongly recommending "The Complete DXer".

On 8/12/2011 4:38 PM, jim wrote:
> For me, the problem is the LIDS    on the DX stations TX  freq..
> The US side   NUTS
>
> I like trying to work them on every BAND/MODE..
> Is that not  what it is all abt ?
>
>
>
> from the shack of
> WB5AAA
> 73 de JIM
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtty-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces at contesting.com] On
> Behalf Of Shelby Summerville
> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 5:17 AM
> To: rtty at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] Response to DX Station
>
> K0IDT wrote: "If you could get everyone to read and abide by the DX Code of
> Conduct it might help  http://dx-code.org/"
>
> As long as DXCC Challenge, DeSoto Cup and the "ego satisfying" attempts to
> stay at the top of the Honor Roll exists, the DX Code of Conduct is not
> applicapable! For the few that "work them and shut up", many, many more try
> and work them on as many bands/modes as possible. I await the day a "rare"
> DXpedition, that has online log availability, and publishes their operating
> style, penalizes duplicate band callers by removing all of their other
> contacts? If one is sure that they are in the online log, I see absolutely
> no reason for another attempt, on the same band. In the case of a new
> entity, "once per band/mode" should be enforced? I also believe that the DX
> has most of the responsibility of "controlling the pileup"?
>
> C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
>