[RTTY] My Macro Opinion

[Jim W7RY]

EXACTLY!

73/88 :)

Jim W7RY


--------------------------------------------------
From: "Susan King" <susan.k5du at gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 6:53 PM
To: "RTTY Reflector" <RTTY at contesting.com>
Subject: [RTTY] My Macro Opinion

> I think all you guys are thinking backwards. You spend too much time
> criticizing
> other folks' contest macros and responses.
>
> I was very careful to create and use crisp, no wasted shifts macros.
>
> CQ RU K5DU K5DU CQ
> and
> YourCall 599 TX TX
>
> Many of the stations in my log used similar crisp clean clear macros. But,
> and it is a
> major but, some hams sent really good alternative responses.
>
> TU HNY 599 VT VERMONT
> and
> 599 599 599 IN INDIANA
> and
> 599 ? IL ? IL 599 ? IL QSL?
> and
> HI SUSAN 599 599 CA CA
> and
> 599 CA 094 599 CA 094
>
> and many GL and 73 and even one 88.
>
> What's good about these responses? These hams answered my CQ. They got on
> the air and gave me
> a point. Sure each one might have cost me a millisecond more, but my score
> would have
> been much lower without them.
>
> If I erased all the QSOs not acceptable to the macro purists, I would have 
> a
> much shorter
> log. I appreciate everyone who gave me a QSO, no matter how long it took.
>
> I never did stop to wonder whether QRZ? or CQ? was correct. I would answer
> either one.
>
> 73, Susan K5DU
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1191 / Virus Database: 1435/3372 - Release Date: 01/10/11
>
>