[RTTY] [Bulk] ROS policeman on 14101

[Joe Subich, W4TV]

On 3/21/2012 6:05 PM, Gary AL9A wrote:
> Per the information at
> http://www.ncdxf.org/beacon/beaconinterference.html the beacon folks
> are asking for a clear frequency from 14099.5 to 14100.5.

They're still being bloody pigs to expect an exclusive 1 KHz wide guard
band in the middle of the RTTY segment of the band.  If they don't want
interference from RTTY move the stupid beacons down to 14.050 or 14.000.
If they go to 14.000 all they need to worry about is the big MM ops.
100 Hz each way is more than enough protection for the beacons ... and
gives a more realistic picture or actual propagation when the band is
busy any way.

> Let's try another suggestion. If you are trying to copy the beacons
> on a weekend and can't hear the CW signals due to the interference
> from contesting stations all over the world, THE BAND IS OPEN!

How about if you're trying to copy the beacons on a weekend and can't
hear the CW signals due to interference, get a life and *make QSOs*
instead of listening to beacons?

73,

    ... Joe, W4TV


On 3/21/2012 6:05 PM, Gary AL9A wrote:
> Per the information at http://www.ncdxf.org/beacon/beaconinterference.html
> the beacon folks are asking for a clear frequency from 14099.5 to 14100.5.
> They do recognize that someone trying to monitor the beacon with a SSB
> receiver with a 2.8 kHz bandwidth is still going to have a problem and
> recommend using the CW mode with a 500 Hz filter.  Duh!
>
> Let's try another suggestion.  If you are trying to copy the beacons on a
> weekend and can't hear the CW signals due to the interference from
> contesting stations all over the world, THE BAND IS OPEN!
>
> 73,
> Gary AL9A
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Turner"<dezrat1242 at yahoo.com>
> To:<rtty at contesting.com>
> Sent: March 21, 2012 12:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] [Bulk] ROS policeman on 14101
>
>
>> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>>
>> On 3/21/2012 12:48 PM, Hank Garretson wrote:
>>> Tongue in cheek.
>>>
>>> So, is the beacon frequency supposed to be reserved?
>>
>> REPLY:
>>
>> Yes, it really should be reserved. The beacons are in operation 24/7,
>> whether they are audible at a particular QTH or not. You could be
>> interfering with someone who CAN hear them.
>>
>> Just a suggestion of course, has no force of law but seems like good
>> practice to me.
>>
>> 73, Bill W6WRT
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>