[RTTY] Fw: ARLB006 NTIA: No Objection to Additional Data Modes on60 Meters

[Jeff Blaine]

Joe,

What are you talking about?  That statement cannot be factual.  Just because 
it's easier to generate a lousy signal with AFSK does not logically requite 
that an AFSK signal is of lower quality.

I do marketing for my day job.  And that got me to thinking.  Maybe what you 
mean is "AFSK with lesser interfaces is often substandard compared to FSK. 
However, with a fine and dandy Microham interface (like the two I have), 
your AFSK signal can be just as sweet and tight as a FSK signal."  Right?

73/jeff/ac0c
www.ac0c.com
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie

-----Original Message----- 
From: Kok Chen
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 6:20 PM
To: RTTY Reflector
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Fw: ARLB006 NTIA: No Objection to Additional Data Modes 
on60 Meters


On Mar 29, 2012, at 4:13 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:

> AFSK is the RTTY mode for technological novices ... those who do not
> know how to operate their transceivers in the way the manufacturer
> designed them to operate.

I would like you to substantiate that statement, Joe.

I haven't transmitted using FSK for years now.  There is so many more 
technological advantages to using AFSK.

73
Chen, W7AY

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty